A Likely Story, Indeed!

Three soldiers break into a medical marijuana dispensary in order to destroy the pot housed inside.

Cops had to rescue them when they locked themselves in the building. 

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- Soldiers accused of breaking into a Colorado medical marijuana dispensary and then accidentally locking themselves inside told police they planned to destroy the marijuana - not smoke or sell it. 

The Gazette in Colorado Springs reports a police affidavit says two of the three Fort Carson soldiers told officers they were trying to steal the marijuana so they could get rid of it. 

Police say the three were arrested Saturday on second-degree burglary charges after they accidentally locked themselves in the Colorado Springs dispensary during a burglary attempt.

WaPo Article.

Hehe.

HAHAHAHAHA!

"We come no to smoke or steal your skunk, but to kill it."


That's audaciousness.

It's the kind of readily apparent lie a kid would tell his parents to explain away the brown stains all over his mouth when the chocolate's gone missing.

Gone Votin'

So we went and did our citizen's duty.

Having moved house since the 2008 election  we went to a different polling place, and it was really busy (of course, last time I voted in the middle of the day, but reported turnout in many places in Oklahoma was characterized as higher than usual during a gubernatorial year).


Rufus was the star of the show - several election workers approached me while I was in line for my ballot to ask questions. This is pretty typical anyplace I go where I wind up in a line, or waiting for something, or standing still for more than two seconds. 


Our xenophobic and spectacularly backward ass state approved a couple of embarrassing and unnecessary ballot questions, and yes, the Sharia Law one passed with flying colors.



State Representative Rex Duncan is remarkably stupid and ignorant, and alas, pretty par for the course in these here parts.

To The Polls

I'll be off to vote later after my wife comes home.

Every person I vote for in my state is going to lose, most by a gigantic margin. Some races that affect me feature incumbents running unopposed.

Oklahoma is a deeply backward state in too many ways, and when the day is done here it will have taken a decisively regressive step by finally simultaneously handing the governorship and both houses of the legislature to the Republican party. 

Big deal, right?

The Oklahoma Republican party is far to the right of the nearly insane national GOP. Every crackpot right wing idea you've heard of being floated in other states or by so-called "Tea Party" folks or conspiracy nuts will be front and center on the legislative agenda in this state once Mary Fallin is elected governor, and the takeover is complete. 

Think Birthers, Tenthers, nullifiers and interpositionists, anti-abortion zealots, immigration extremists, theocratic assholes and the like, and you've just got a notion of what politics will look like for 2011 Oklahoma. Pay attention to what happens here the next year or so, for it will be a preview of what will occur nationally if the inmates take over the Federal asylum, as they so rabidly hope to do.

I'll be voting today, because it is the right thing to do, and my  vote on some of the state questions (which include one of those lunatic right wing things about Sharia Law) may make a difference.

Repeat After Me

"Regulatory capture is a myth"

As George H. Painter was preparing to retire recently as one of two administrative law judges presiding over investor complaints at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, he issued an extraordinary request: 

Please don't assign my pending cases to the other judge. 

In a notice recently released by the CFTC, Painter said Judge Bruce Levine, his longtime colleague, had a secret agreement with a former Republican chairwoman of the agency to stand in the way of investors filing complaints with the agency. 

"On Judge Levine's first week on the job, nearly twenty years ago, he came into my office and stated that he had promised Wendy Gramm, then Chairwoman of the Commission, that we would never rule in a complainant's favor," Painter wrote. "A review of his rulings will confirm that he fulfilled his vow," Painter wrote. 

Painter continued: "Judge Levine, in the cynical guise of enforcing the rules, forces pro se complainants to run a hostile procedural gauntlet until they lose hope, and either withdraw their complaint or settle for a pittance, regardless of the merits of the case." 

The CFTC oversees trading of the nation's most important commodities, including oil, gold and cotton. The agency's administrative law judges handle cases in which investors allege that trading professionals or financial firms violated the rules. 

 Gramm's name in this is no surprise, considering to whom she was married and the infamous corporate board she soon wound up sitting on.

Headline Of The Day

From the "no shit" headline department:

 Banks Shared Clients’ Profits, but Not Losses

Here is the deal: Funds lend some of their stocks and bonds to Wall Street, in return for cash that banks like JPMorgan then invest. If the trades do well, the bank takes a cut of the profits. If the trades do poorly, the funds absorb all of the losses. 

The strategy is called securities lending, a practice that is thriving even though some investments linked to it were virtually wiped out during the financial panic of 2008. These trades were supposed to be safe enough to make a little extra money at little risk. 

JPMorgan customers, including public or corporate pension funds of I.B.M., New York State and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, ended up owing JPMorgan more than $500 million to cover the losses. But JPMorgan protected itself on some of these investments and kept millions of dollars in profit, before the trades went awry. 

"Went awry."

Hehe.

But they got theirs, and that's all that matters.

These Are Not Accidents

The financial crisis was not an accident or series of accidents, as has been proclaimed by its progenitors and the involved industries and even much of government itself. It was the logical outcome of releasing large corporations from any sane regulatory restraint, and worse, in many cases writing new regulations specifically allowing and encouraging extremely risky behavior.

With other people's money. And they got to keep all the profits. Personally.

Then there was the housing bubble, an intrinsic part of this grand theft of unsurpassed proportions, actively inflated by the Bush administration from pretty much day one of operations. The giant financial corporations and their many ill-spawned children were directly involved in creating a mortgage morass that now has companies foreclosing on homes they have no legal claim to, using an evidence free bald assertion process in letters to homeowners and the few courts in which they've been challenged to prove their "rights."

Which leads the ever spot-on Paul Krugman to note and ask:

The accounting scandals at Enron and WorldCom dispelled the myth of effective corporate governance. These days, the idea that our banks were well capitalized and supervised sounds like a sick joke. And now the mortgage mess is making nonsense of claims that we have effective contract enforcement — in fact, the question is whether our economy is governed by any kind of rule of law.

In fact, it is governed by a kind of rule of law, the law that the rich and powerful create on the fly and assert behind the cover of armies of lawyers trained in the arcana of the regulations these same corporations wrote in rooms just off the floor of Congress in the late 1990s and all of the 2000s. And Krugman is also correct when he talks in that same cloumn about the essential character of every Obama response to the banks, mortgage companies and other criminal organizations and their leaders - utter deference in all things. 

We Can't Build Shit

I once visited Hoover Dam at the Nevada-Arizona border. I'd been up most of the night before playing nickel slots in the lobby of the Sahara where we were staying, so when my future brother in law and I set out I was pretty tired, but it was nothing a few jugs of coffee couldn't cure.

Approaching the dam is a lot like approaching Las Vegas itself - the dry desert heat suddenly gives way to this humid wash of air, a sign of the excess water displays in the city, and of the Colorado river itself, trapped in narrow Black Canyon. Then you see the gigantic power line towers that stick out at an angle over the river, guiding the massive electricity cables up over the lip of the canyon to set them on a path parallel to the ground, carrying power to multiple states.

As if that isn't incredible enough to look upon, you eventually wend your way around the two lane black top to see the top of the dam itself, which looks rather thin at first glance, until you realize this is just the top of a massive 700+ foot tall structure that is 660 feet thick at its base. The word "awesome" is much overused in American culture, but this thing easily qualifies.

The interior is as impressive as the exterior, with marble floors and Deco accents all over the place. It is an industrial construct of absolute beauty.

Hoover Dam was constructed both ahead of schedule and under budget. We could argue all day about the environmental effects of American dam building generally, worker safety in the 1930s, our water use policies, and electricity consumption, but the thing itself is a major work of human engineering, capital, and will.

Flash forward to 2010. A tunnel connecting New York and New Jersey to double the rate of passenger travel between those two destinations (for which current carrying capacity is already over taxed) that has been in the works for 20 years has suddenly ground to a halt because the new governor of New Jersey, a fiscal charlatan named Chirs Christie, has decided his state can no longer afford its share.

I'll let the estimable Bob Herbert put it in words  I never could:

The United States is not just losing its capacity to do great things. It’s losing its soul. It’s speeding down an increasingly rubble-strewn path to a region where being second rate is good enough. 

The railroad tunnel was the kind of infrastructure project that used to get done in the United States almost as a matter of routine. It was a big and expensive project, but the payoff would have been huge. It would have reduced congestion and pollution in the New York-New Jersey corridor. It would have generated economic activity and put thousands of people to work. It would have enabled twice as many passengers to ride the trains on that heavily traveled route between the two states. 

The project had been in the works for 20 years, and ground had already been broken when the governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie, rejected the project on Thursday, saying that his state could not afford its share of the costs. Extreme pressure is being exerted from federal officials and others to get Mr. Christie to change his mind, but, as of now, the project is a no-go. 

This is a railroad tunnel we’re talking about. We’re not trying to go to the Moon. This is not the Manhattan Project. It’s a railroad tunnel that’s needed to take people back and forth to work and to ease the pressure on the existing tunnel, a wilting two-track facility that’s about 100 years old. What is the matter with us?

The rest is well worth reading, as Herbert ties this sort of rudderless leadership to the present unemployment emergency, about which no one seems willing to do the heavy lifting to solve the problem. 80 years ago government created agencies to contract with companies and individuals to build a modern infrastructure, much of which we still enjoy today, crumbling as it may be, and to simply put people to work to give them spending money and some small, precious shred of dignity. These days, we determine the right amount of stimulus to jolt the economy back into gear, then cut it in half before even considering whether to enact it. We have become beholden to an ideology that proclaims government is incapable of doing anything at all useful, and when the proponents of that ideology take power, they make sure that view becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. This is the ideology of the modern Republican Party, which was carried out quite efficiently during the W. years, when people were appointed to head agencies overseeing the very sectors of industry from which they made their many millions, regulations were slashed, discarded, or simply ignored, and a form of maximalist capitalism known as "got mine" was allowed to run untethered by sanity or prudence. 

As a result, the electorate, the alleged party of opposition which now holds power, and the media have bought the idea that this sort of thinking is true, that, at default, government is evil and always incompetent if not down right criminal, and thus can never be part of the solution to major national problems such as those we have been facing for the last three years. It is a poisonous, false ideology, and it is destroying our country's ability to do anything useful for anyone who isn't already stinking rich.

I've got news for you motherfuckers. We ain't number 1. At anything. Not anymore.

Speaking Of Government Teats...

Matt Taibbi kicks over the Tea Party ant nest and discovers...a bunch of ignorant, angry Republican folks who are quite happy to collect benefits and pensions form the government they regard as absolutely tyrannical.

Same goes for Hatriot candidate Sharron Angle in Nevada, who claims government benefits and health care every month, as does her husband.

But of course, this was never about deficits, budgets, fiscal propriety or any of the other bullshit they've been spewing the last two years, it's about who else might be getting a thin dime of "their" tax money. And what's changed? The color of the president's skin and the party in charge. They fear and hate Others so much they are convinced that now, only now, these same government programs that have been humming along for decades are suddenly some sort of free ATM for the poor and non-white.

It really is nuts, but incredibly revealing.

Shock! Tea Party A Republican Retread!

I'm shocked! Shocked! I tell you, to discover that, contrary to gullible mainstream media reportage, the "Tea Party Movement" is not only not new, it's just the same right wing Republicans freaking out because the other guys took Congress and the White House in 2006 and 2008.

Steve Kornacki tells the story:

The main difference between then and now, I've been saying, is that the GOP base's backlash didn't have a catchy name when Clinton was president. But today, it does: The Tea Party.

And now there's even more proof that the terms "Tea Party movement" and "Republican Party base" are interchangeable. A new poll conducted for NBC News and the Wall Street Journal finds that 27 percent of voters describe themselves as Tea Party supporters. And what do we know about the people that make up that 27 percent? Here's how NBC's First Read put it:

These folks, it turns out, are more conservative and bigger watchers of FOX News than your typical Republican. Per [Bill] McInturff, Tea Party members are simply re-branded conservative GOP primary voters -- not something completely new. “These are conservative Republicans who watch FOX, and who are very ticked off,” he said.

Bill McInturff, by the way, is a longtime Republican pollster. Nor is this the first time the demographic similarities between the Tea Party movement and the GOP base have been documented; we've written about it here before.

But it's impossible to emphasize this crossover enough, given how willing the media has been to treat the Tea Party movement as some unique, non-partisan uprising of the middle class against Obama's governing vision. In reality, it's just the modern (i.e. post-Rockefeller/Eastern Establishment era) Republican base doing what it always does when Democrats run the show in Washington.

• Continue reading

Jebus Is A Small Part Of The Problem

This is exactly right, for those who have any fantasies that the burn-it-down approach of the American right wing is something new or more virulent than in the past:

http://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2010/09/its-not-unchecked-christianism-its.html

They are a deeply sickening bunch, and when they have destroyed government and hoovered up all the cash they will stand atop the rubble with a big fucking megaphone and declare victory in all our names, whilst we wander the streets, dazed and shell-shocked, squabbling over scraps from dumpsters and killing one another for control of sodden cardboard boxes to use as shelter.

Question Of The Day

Some things should make you go "hmm..."

In all the fit-pitching over the mosque/community center being built several blocks from ground zero, much has been made about how that is "hallowed ground," and building an Islamic center, again, several blocks away somehow dishonors that hallowed ground.

It occurs to me that the plans to build a gigantic, high rent tower right on top of the graves of the atomized victims of the September 11th attacks could more readily be described as dishonoring "sacred ground." 

But hey, if the religion in question is maximal capitalism and the monument to it has in its foundations the particles of the actual humans who died that day (including Muslims), it's no problem. But an Islamic center being built blocks away is blasphemy.

This is a psychotic country.

But but but...Marriage!

Ross Douthat is in the clutches of a fuill blown homosexual panic.

Glenn Greenwald tries to slap some sense into him.

We are not convinced Glenn's heroic efforts wil succeed, but we appreciate his reasoning.

Skin Deep Thought Of The Moment

If the entire framework of political discussion in America has been dragged rightward by an increasingly extremist and influential right wing (and it most certainly has), that necessarily means self-described "centrists" have all become Republicans.

This is also a by product of a Democratic party enthralled by corporate considerations. As it drifts ever more toward the right, it pushes the center before it.



No?

Lies, Lies, Lies.

Tom Coburn is a lying sack of shit.

As Republican lies on health care go, this one's pretty despicable.
For one thing, Coburn doesn't understand what the Preventive Services Task Force said -- the mammogram recommendation had to do with research-based standards, not cost.

More important, though, the legislation's provision on a 5% tax on elective cosmetic surgery clearly excludes procedures for those with congenital abnormalities, disfiguring diseases, or traumatic injuries. Anyone requiring reconstructive surgery resulting from accidents or diseases would be exempt.

There is no "5% tax on the breast reconstruction surgery after they had a mastectomy." Coburn's making it up, hoping no one notices how offensive his lying really is.

There is no depth to which the Republican party will not stoop in defense of their corporate brethren in the parasitic health insurance industry.

Cover Of The Day

Goes to "Jailhouse Rock" as covered by the Jeff Beck Group on 1969's Beck-Ola. With the ever talented (but for decades since, musically useless) Rod Stewart growling and howling his way through the lyrics, the song is transformed into something truly dangerous. Beck's guitar wails, screams and roars all over the mix, often in the background, but no less spectacular for it. The sound and playing are incredible and almost out of control. At times I'm convinced the whole track is going to simply explode, taking my speakers with it.

Elvis covers are a dime a dozen, but this is one of the few that stands out for originality, performance, and sheer wildness.


Best played with the volume at 11.

Dilbert Spam

Well, this is new. I received a spam email from "Rick" sent through the Dilbert.com domain, replete with a cute Dilbert cartoon at the bottom of the page.

The text is the usual 419 phishing crap:

Your friend Rich wanted us to send you this from Dilbert.com.

Message from Rich:

From Richard
Dear one,

Permit me to inform you of my desire of going into business relationship with you, I got your contact from your country directory, please i need a trust-worthy person that will help me to transfer this money.

I am richard sanko, the only Son of late Mr and Mrs johnson Sanko My father was a very wealthy Gold Merchant in sierra leon the Capital of republic of sierra leon.

my father was poisoned by his business associates while my mother died when i am little and my father took me so special because I am his only son.

Before the death of my father on 14th Setember 2007 in a hospital in Cote D'ivoire, he secretly called me and told me that he has the sum of(USD $8 MILLION U.S DOLLARS )which he deposited in a bank Abroad.

He also made me understand that it was because of this money he was poisoned by his business associates while on a business trip with them and he instructed me to look for a foreign partner who will help me transfer this money out of Cote Divoire and invest it for me, my purpose of contacting you is for you to help transfer this money to your country before this people who kill my father will kill me too.

I'm now hiding in a local place and I will compensate you with 20% of this money if you help me to transfer the money to your account l hope you will not betray the trust i have on you because this money is my only hope in this life and you will also help me to come over to your country to continue my education while you will invest my own share of the money for me.

I can assure you there is No Risk involve the money is an inheritance from my late father.


If you are interested please furnish me with your.
1) Real Names
2) Phone/Fax numbers
3) Occupation
4) Residence address

I am waiting to hear from you,
thank you.
Richard Sanko

There is no doubt this was actually routed via the Dilbert.com domain, which means either someone is cutting and pasting this spiel and sending it to random or bought email addresses, or Dilbert has been hacked. I don't quite know enough about it to render a judgment. I did send the Dilbert.com administrator an email through their web site, and got an automated response. We'll see what happens.

Abominable Snowbunny Resigns

I've watched the entire 18+ minutes of her resignation announcement, and I have to say that it was off the charts weird, even for Sarah Palin. Jittery, nervous, nonsensical, the speech, if you can characterize it as such, rambled all over the map, in the end, failing to do what it was intended - give some sort of coherent rationale for leaving the governor's office well before her term ended. I read the first transcript before it was pulled from the Alaska government web site, and it was full of air quotes, fully capitalized words, and lots of exclamation marks, often bunched all together to keep warm.

My personal feeling is this was prompted by several things - boredom with her job, harsh criticism of her job performance and from the presidential campaign, a desire to cash in on her name, and likely a way of minimizing some sort of incoming ethics scandal, presumably one rather serious as she has been wildly successful at utilizing the organs of the state of Alaska to exonerate herself from wrongdoing in all previous complaints against her. That last may prove the killing blow, but we'll have to wait and see.

And the presidency? Never rule it out. Rachel asked me after I told her Palin was resigning if I thought she could still run and win in 2012 against an incumbent Obama. And I paused, because my gut answer - "shit no!" - isn't all that clear. The country is in deep shit, and so far, despite the talk of "green shoots" there are no concrete signs of recovery. Imagine things are this bad when Republican primaries get set to jump off, and she could conceivably not only become the nominee, but win if conditions remain poor or get worse.

Know-nothing populism can be a very powerful force to people caught in the midst of a gigantic shit storm apparently without an end in sight. The electorate would eventually regret handing someone so clearly unfit for high office that much power, but the damage she could wreak while she held the reigns is almost unimaginable. Her gleeful, prideful ignorance is awesomely dangerous when hitched to the power of the presidency.

In the short term, expect to see her on the Wingnut Welfare circuit, giving talks for 10-20k a pop, getting her book published, making all sorts of appearances as a way to position herself for 2012, even if she ultimately decides not to run.

She is addicted to exposure, fame, and the idea of power.

So What's The Punishment?

If abortion is to be illegal, what sort of punishment for women who obtain illegal abortions should there be?

To my astonishment, anti-abortion movement members who will take their cause to the streets haven't even thought about it. This is a fascinating video (embedding was turned off, so follow the link):

Video

Context

In a comment following a post by hilzoy, aimai casts the murder of Dr. Tiller in a stark light:

Lets get real here. There is one and only one doctor left in this country to whom a desperate woman and her family can resort if they require a late term abortion. One. That isn't an accident and its not a bug. Its a feature of a right wing campaign of violent harassment.

I've been pregnant, twice, and was lucky enough not to need an abortion. But I asked my ob-gyn, the woman I was trusting with my life and health and with that of my unborn child, whether if I ended up needing an abortion or, say, currettage if the fetus died in the womb, I could continue to rely on her care. She said, bluntly, "no." And that I would have to find myself some kind of "clinic" to care for me.

This is not some abstract problem for naughty women. Its a problem for *families*, for men and women, for fathers and mothers, and siblings and children. Because the "choice" that women are faced with in late term abortions is between death for themselves or death for themselves and the fetus.

In killing this compassionate man the right wing--yes, all of the hysterics and the anti choicers and the nice people who get squicked out by abortion but who don't get squicked out by the gunning down of an elderly doctor--have put adult women's lives at risk. And for what? The fetuses that are terminated in late abortions are almost uniformly fetuses that will not survive outside the womb.

The anti abortion movement turned poor Dr. Tiller and his patients into a caricature and into targets in order to intimidate other doctors and women from gaining access to lawful medical care. What they could not gain politically, or legally in a court of law, they chose to try to gain through out and out terrorism and int intimidation. There is simply no question about that.

Whether individual posters like x, or y, support that level of intimidation, or why they prefer violent and non violent intimidation over (say) rational discourse and polite political action, is not for me to say. I don't even really care. They have said they see nothing wrong with stalking and harassing medical professionals, and they have refused to condemn the murder. That says enough about them as people and there's nothing any of the other posters need say.

Well Said

Lacking anything coherent or useful to say at the moment about the murder of Dr. Tiller and the disingenuous response of the anti-abortion zealots, I'll let someone not similarly blocked take it away:

For eight fucking years anybody to the left of Pinochet had to kick back and watch while sensible centrists and the Coalition of the Involuntarily Committable got together and raped the country and fucked up the whole world. For eight fucking years we were told that marching in the streets with giant puppets was the most horrific form of treason imaginable, was demoralizing our troops and hurting the debate and making the baby Pope Benedict cry. Not once did I ever in that time hear Megan McArdle or any of her other sensible friends discuss how maybe, just maybe, President Bush and his administration had PUSHED us to the edge, where we HAD to make those puppets because we felt the political process was closed to us.

No, back then it was "elections have consequences" and "you lost" and "look upon my works, ye mighty, and fuck off," and anytime anybody had the temerity to say, "erm, dude, if you don't mind I'll be over here with this sign on a stick" they might as well have been plotting to shoe-bomb Air Force One the way the whiners in the nuttersphere howled and shrieked. There was none of this, "you just don't know how hard it is to be on the losing end of everything including your soul" back then. Just them, partying with Free Republic on the White House lawn, waving their big foam fingers in our faces going "nyah nyah nyah."

Now that they're out of power, natch, what choice do they have but to go shoot up church lobbies in the hopes of bagging abortion doctors for their trophy wall of American apostates? Really, what else could they do? It's not like they could vote, or convince other people to listen to them, or organize, or do any of the damn things I feel like we've been doing since before there was dirt in order to get a not-entirely-crazy in-another-life-he'd-be-a-moderate-Republican dude finally elected so a third of the country could act like Satan just put his feet up on their mother's white-clothed dinner table. It's not like they could do anything else, right? They had to start shooting.

Right?